One of the things about this foolish, changeable disease, is that you have to do so much self-management, sometimes in spite of your doctor. One can always hope to be on the same wavelength, but occasionally the focus differs and you have to think it through yourself. My neuro told me that the Baclofen I'd been prescribed by another doc for spasticity wasn't really needed in my case since I didn't have any spasticity.
Well, true, then I just had twitches, not spasms. So he gave me drugs for twitches. Fair enough.
But I've been unable to walk more than a block without pain for weeks now. Some of it is no doubt due to the kidney stone thing, but even once it was gone, my legs weren't working together. One foot spasmed regularly. Pain and I became close personal friends. And as someone whose big kidney stone was found halfway down the ureter (and I was in minor discomfort), when I feel pain, it should tell me something.
So today I decided to try a baclofen. And you know what? It worked. I just came back from my first fast walk in weeks. My legs worked together with my knees and I could hoof it as I like to, fast enough to satisfy even the rampant poodle. My hips swung along like they are supposed to, easily, cheerfully, enjoying the movement. It was f-ing amazing.
Motion is so wonderful to experience when you've lost it for awhile. There is something so mystical about the way a body works together, the way the hip swings in the socket, the way the shoulders move within the framework of muscles, the support and flexibility of the spine. I am almost giddy with the joy of it all. Those of you, who can move easily - go for a walk. It's a true gift.
A blog about living with MS. Why Mad Sow? In homage to Denny Crane, on the TV program Boston Legal. Every time he forgot something, he'd point to his head and say "Mad Cow." I refer to my MS, primarily a cognitive thing at present, as my Mad Sow.
March 28, 2011
March 14, 2011
What MS means to me
Sheesh.
The National MS Society in the US has created this blogging thing where you can write in what MS means to you. Sometimes I think they just have their heads up their respective arses, if you'll pardon my language. I THINK they were looking for positives. It seems to be a current theme on some of these websites that you should be thinking "I have MS, MS doesn't have me" and talking about all the good stuff that comes into your life because of MS, blah blah blah.
Well, I'm as Pollyanna-ish as the next person, possibly more, and I try to see benefits in whatever life throws at me, but by GODS it is offensive when people who do not have MS come up with these campaigns. "MS means rallying around the ones you love" is an example.
Erm, don't mean to be snarky, but has anyone looked at how many of us live ALONE with MS? Hmm? And that we may not have people available to "rally around" us? I have some lovely friends and family, don't get me wrong, but I would wear them out if I told them all that was going on with me. They'd drop me quicker than a hot iron. And why not? They are all busy with their own concerns - sick parents, health crises, kid issues, rocky marriages, life. As Rick says in Casablanca, "Our problems don't amount to a hill of beans..."
But enough of that. The thing that stinks is that no matter how much you say to yourself that "MS doesn't have me", you are lying to yourself. It has its cold fingers round your throat, right enough. It lurks, waiting to screw up your life. You can take care of yourself, you can eat right and smile and read positive things and breathe pure air and yet, it's there, waiting.
So hey, my approach is to just laugh it off. Life is short. So what if I can't feel my fingers while I type this? They still type almost as well as they ever did - today. And walking? I always preferred the sitting and having coffee afterwards anyway - it's just that now I have to plan to do it sooner. Biking? Well, unless I get a better helmet, it's over for me - balance issues - but hey, I've always wanted an adult trike.
Reframing loss is one thing, but laughing at it is even better.
Sometimes, though, it isn't so easy. Sometimes Pollyanna leaves the building. Sometimes getting mad is the only solution, since self-pity is SO unattractive. Which is part of the reason I tell myself I have Mad Sow - craziness notwithstanding.
The National MS Society in the US has created this blogging thing where you can write in what MS means to you. Sometimes I think they just have their heads up their respective arses, if you'll pardon my language. I THINK they were looking for positives. It seems to be a current theme on some of these websites that you should be thinking "I have MS, MS doesn't have me" and talking about all the good stuff that comes into your life because of MS, blah blah blah.
Well, I'm as Pollyanna-ish as the next person, possibly more, and I try to see benefits in whatever life throws at me, but by GODS it is offensive when people who do not have MS come up with these campaigns. "MS means rallying around the ones you love" is an example.
Erm, don't mean to be snarky, but has anyone looked at how many of us live ALONE with MS? Hmm? And that we may not have people available to "rally around" us? I have some lovely friends and family, don't get me wrong, but I would wear them out if I told them all that was going on with me. They'd drop me quicker than a hot iron. And why not? They are all busy with their own concerns - sick parents, health crises, kid issues, rocky marriages, life. As Rick says in Casablanca, "Our problems don't amount to a hill of beans..."
But enough of that. The thing that stinks is that no matter how much you say to yourself that "MS doesn't have me", you are lying to yourself. It has its cold fingers round your throat, right enough. It lurks, waiting to screw up your life. You can take care of yourself, you can eat right and smile and read positive things and breathe pure air and yet, it's there, waiting.
So hey, my approach is to just laugh it off. Life is short. So what if I can't feel my fingers while I type this? They still type almost as well as they ever did - today. And walking? I always preferred the sitting and having coffee afterwards anyway - it's just that now I have to plan to do it sooner. Biking? Well, unless I get a better helmet, it's over for me - balance issues - but hey, I've always wanted an adult trike.
Reframing loss is one thing, but laughing at it is even better.
Sometimes, though, it isn't so easy. Sometimes Pollyanna leaves the building. Sometimes getting mad is the only solution, since self-pity is SO unattractive. Which is part of the reason I tell myself I have Mad Sow - craziness notwithstanding.
March 3, 2011
"It's hard to take over the world when you sleep 20 hours a day." Darby Conley
I foolishly signed up for two writing classes recently, running concurrently. In the middle of them, I've now decided to move to Dartmouth, NS. I'm having some difficulty with all of this. See, right now, my body is demanding a healthy sleep in, a nap from 1:30 to 4 or 5, and then early to bed no later than 10. It's hard to fit everything in to a day truncated like that, and I now understand why dogs and cats, despite their enviable smarts and ability to control us, have yet to take over the world.
Fatigue in MS is a weird thing. Sometimes, it feels like water is welling up and gradually flowing over my head. Sleep is irresistible, exhaustion so complete that even eating is too much to contemplate (those of you who know me know this is serious stuff). It feels like a remix of the mono I had in University, where all I could think of was sleep. glorious sleep. I sleep sitting up, I try to make it to lying down. If I'm walking, my legs no longer move effectively. My batteries shut off.
Sometimes, the fatigue is cerebral. I can feel okay physically one minute, and then lose my mind the next. Can't talk, can't bear talking, can't even think of a thing to say. My lips don't want to move. Making decisions is almost impossible. I feel trapped within myself, deadened, mute. Even my hearing doesn't seem right. My vision blurs and I can't see well anymore. Parts of my visual field fuzz out entirely.
Sometimes, when I am feeling tired, if I get up and exercise, I can feel better. Sometimes the thought of that is just too much to bear. Sometimes, when I am tired of speaking, I can still write. Sometimes I can't even read.
It's bizarre, and just when I think I have it figured out, it eludes me again. For awhile I was mainlining coffee to cope, but that doesn't seem to be doing it for me anymore. I do know that if I go out at night, I need a coffee to see me safely home.
So, in the end, I wind up like Brain, planning to take over the world - tomorrow night.
Fatigue in MS is a weird thing. Sometimes, it feels like water is welling up and gradually flowing over my head. Sleep is irresistible, exhaustion so complete that even eating is too much to contemplate (those of you who know me know this is serious stuff). It feels like a remix of the mono I had in University, where all I could think of was sleep. glorious sleep. I sleep sitting up, I try to make it to lying down. If I'm walking, my legs no longer move effectively. My batteries shut off.
Sometimes, the fatigue is cerebral. I can feel okay physically one minute, and then lose my mind the next. Can't talk, can't bear talking, can't even think of a thing to say. My lips don't want to move. Making decisions is almost impossible. I feel trapped within myself, deadened, mute. Even my hearing doesn't seem right. My vision blurs and I can't see well anymore. Parts of my visual field fuzz out entirely.
Sometimes, when I am feeling tired, if I get up and exercise, I can feel better. Sometimes the thought of that is just too much to bear. Sometimes, when I am tired of speaking, I can still write. Sometimes I can't even read.
It's bizarre, and just when I think I have it figured out, it eludes me again. For awhile I was mainlining coffee to cope, but that doesn't seem to be doing it for me anymore. I do know that if I go out at night, I need a coffee to see me safely home.
So, in the end, I wind up like Brain, planning to take over the world - tomorrow night.
March 1, 2011
Danger, Will Robinson!
The other day, I headed out to get in my car and drive to an appointment. I pushed the usual button on the elevator, rode down, and when the door opened, I had no idea at all where I was, or why I was on that particular floor. I froze, not knowing. I backed up into the elevator, looked at the buttons uncomprehendingly. My building is a bit confusing in that the front door is on the second floor; the ground floor is #1 and leads to the garage and laundry room and a street exit. But I've lived here for 21/2 years. It should be fairly second nature to me.
I panicked a bit. Just a little, in a sort of wtf way. Shook my head and decided to try going down the hallway - and once I had walked about ten steps, it became clear where I was.
It's one of the few times I've had that experience. The other brain things that happen are forgetting the names of people I've known for years, losing any concept of numbers, gradually losing everything around my apartment.
Right now my place is a mess, with way too much stuff piled around in messy heaps because I am trying to clear everything out I do not need and reduce my moving costs.
I feel as if my brain is floating rather unattached. Perhaps it's just this that has me confused. I hope so!
Danger! Danger!
I panicked a bit. Just a little, in a sort of wtf way. Shook my head and decided to try going down the hallway - and once I had walked about ten steps, it became clear where I was.
It's one of the few times I've had that experience. The other brain things that happen are forgetting the names of people I've known for years, losing any concept of numbers, gradually losing everything around my apartment.
Right now my place is a mess, with way too much stuff piled around in messy heaps because I am trying to clear everything out I do not need and reduce my moving costs.
I feel as if my brain is floating rather unattached. Perhaps it's just this that has me confused. I hope so!
Danger! Danger!
February 26, 2011
Reviewing the CCSVI research..
In my role as education person for the local MS Society, I've been called upon to try and figure out a presentation re: CCSVI. The only problem is that little research has been completed to date. There are status updates to the research funded by the MS Societies on their pages, but I went wandering through the other research looking for something else that might have been done.
Here are my conclusions:
Anyone associated with Dr.s Zamboni, Haacke, Simka, or their research institute have found that CCSVI has positive results. Sample sizes are small, and my impression is that the several published papers resulted mainly from the same study set.
Anyone who is a neurologist finds no benefits from the CCSVI procedure. Their study sizes are also small, except for one study that looked for brain ferritin levels (following the iron damage hypothesis) which looked at 1408 patients with brain disorders and normals and found an increased amount of ferritin in people with various forms of MS and brain damage of other sorts.
Interestingly, studies by interventional radiologists also don't find a positive association between CCSVI treatment and MS improvement.
"Improvement" is, as has been said before, stated in terms of fatigue level improvement, some sensory improvement. As someone who is dead tired all the time and numb from stem to stern, this sounds vaguely appealing, except for the costs. And the transience of the improvement. The study summaries are below.
The small sample sizes are a problem, as so much difference can be explained by random changes, especially in a variable disease like MS. It's also a problem that most of the studies were unblinded - in other words, the experimenters knew who they were looking at. This allows for bias and in fact, if you happen to have a vested interest in the results, like the neurologists who have invested years in the autoimmune theory, or the Zamboni group who are currently marketing the only machine capable of detecting the hard to find CCSVI (some conflict of interest there, methinks), bias comes in inevitably.
On the good side, the whole debate has increased interest in MS research. On the bad side, several people have, for some unknown reason, decided the current researchers are not capable of doing a proper study, and so have stopped sending money to the MS Society. Instead we should be sending more, and demanding unbiased studies, multisectorial, blinded, and large. We won't know for sure until we get those studies done. Until then, taking a stand is perhaps premature.
Here are my conclusions:
Anyone associated with Dr.s Zamboni, Haacke, Simka, or their research institute have found that CCSVI has positive results. Sample sizes are small, and my impression is that the several published papers resulted mainly from the same study set.
Anyone who is a neurologist finds no benefits from the CCSVI procedure. Their study sizes are also small, except for one study that looked for brain ferritin levels (following the iron damage hypothesis) which looked at 1408 patients with brain disorders and normals and found an increased amount of ferritin in people with various forms of MS and brain damage of other sorts.
Interestingly, studies by interventional radiologists also don't find a positive association between CCSVI treatment and MS improvement.
"Improvement" is, as has been said before, stated in terms of fatigue level improvement, some sensory improvement. As someone who is dead tired all the time and numb from stem to stern, this sounds vaguely appealing, except for the costs. And the transience of the improvement. The study summaries are below.
The small sample sizes are a problem, as so much difference can be explained by random changes, especially in a variable disease like MS. It's also a problem that most of the studies were unblinded - in other words, the experimenters knew who they were looking at. This allows for bias and in fact, if you happen to have a vested interest in the results, like the neurologists who have invested years in the autoimmune theory, or the Zamboni group who are currently marketing the only machine capable of detecting the hard to find CCSVI (some conflict of interest there, methinks), bias comes in inevitably.
On the good side, the whole debate has increased interest in MS research. On the bad side, several people have, for some unknown reason, decided the current researchers are not capable of doing a proper study, and so have stopped sending money to the MS Society. Instead we should be sending more, and demanding unbiased studies, multisectorial, blinded, and large. We won't know for sure until we get those studies done. Until then, taking a stand is perhaps premature.
| Study/date | Blinded? | Number of participants | results |
| The perfect crime? CCSVI not leaving a trace in MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print] | Yes ++ | 20 MS, 20 controls | No retrograde blood flow Conclusions This triple-blinded extra- and transcranial duplex sonographic assessment of cervical and cerebral veins does not provide supportive evidence for the presence of CCSVI in MS patients. The findings cast serious doubt on the concept of CCSVI in MS. |
| Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and iron deposition on susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot case-control studyInt Angiol. 2010 Apr;29(2):158-75. | No | 16 RRMS 8 controls | All 16 MS patients fulfilled the diagnosis of CCSVI (median VH=4), compared to none of the HC Iron concentration measures were related to longer disease duration and increased disability as measured by EDSS and MSFC, and to increased MRI lesion burden and decreased brain volume. |
| CSF dynamics and brain volume in multiple sclerosis are associated with extracranial venous flow anomalies: a pilot study. Int Angiol. 2010 Apr;29(2):140-8. | No | 16 MS 8 controls | Vascular Hemodynamic changes occur more frequently in MS patients than controls. Altered VH is associated with abnormal CSF flow dynamics and decreased brain volume. |
| No Evidence of Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency at Multiple Sclerosis Onset Claudio Baracchini, MD,1 Paola Perini, MD,1,2 Massimiliano Calabrese, MD,1,2 Francesco Causin, MD,3 Francesca Rinaldi, MD,1,2 and Paolo Gallo, MD, PhD1 | No | 50 MS 60 global amnesia 60 healthy. | Our findings do not support a cause-effect relationship between CCSVI and pMS. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether CCSVI is associated with later disease stages and characterizes the progressive forms of MS. |
| Intracranial venous pressure is normal in patients with multiple sclerosis. | No | 29 MS 28 Controls 19 patients with increased intracranial pressure | There is no evidence of an increased intracranial venous pressure in MS patients. |
| Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Feb;34(1):1-2. Epub 2010 Dec 7. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe commentary on the treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. | No | Comment only | Thus far, no trial data are available, and there is currently no randomized controlled trial (RCT) in proress Therefore, the basis for this new treatment rests on anecdotal evidence and successful testimonies by patients on the Internet. CIRSE believes that this is not a sound basis on which to offer a new treatment, which could have possible procedure-related complications, to an often desperate patient population. PMID: 21136256 [PubMed - in process] |
| Nervenarzt. 2010 Jun;81(6):740-6. ["Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency" and multiple sclerosis: critical analysis and first observation in an unselected cohort of MS patients]. [Article in German] | No | ? | The "venous hypothesis" is analyzed and evaluated with regard to the following aspects: first concerning the validity of published data, second with regard to the plausibility in view of the currently approved pathogenetic model of MS, and third with regard to the compatibility with preliminary neurosonological findings in a small but unselected cohort of patients at our department.The authors conclude that the "chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI)" cannot represent the exclusive pathogenetic factor in the pathogenesis of MS. In our cohort, only 20% of the patients fulfilled the required neurosonological features of CCSVI. So far, the pathogenetic relevance of these findings remains speculative. Thus, based on the current scientific position we cannot justify invasive "therapeutic" approaches, especially if they are performed outside of clinical trials. |
| Normal CSF ferritin levels in MS suggest against etiologic role of chronic venous insufficiency. Worthington V, Killestein J, Eikelenboom MJ, Teunissen CE, Barkhof F, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM, Petzold A. Neurology. 2010 Nov 2;75(18):1617-22. Epub 2010 Sep 29. | No | cross-sectional (n = 1,408) longitudinal (n = 29) patients with MS and a range of neurologic disorders. | Pathologic (>12 ng/mL) CSF ferritin levels were observed in 4% of the control patients (median 4 ng/mL), 91% of patients with superficial siderosis (75 ng/mL), 73% of patients with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (59 ng/mL), 10% of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (5 ng/mL), 11% of patients with primary progressive MS (6 ng/mL), 23% of patients with secondary progressive MS (5 ng/mL), and 23% of patients with meningoencephalitis (5 ng/mL). In MS, there was no significant change of CSF ferritin levels over the 3-year follow-up period. CONCLUSION: These data do not support an etiologic role for CCSVI-related parenchymal iron deposition |
| No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010 Aug;68(2):173-83. | No | 56 MS 20 Controls Sonography study, flow analysis, CCSVI criteria | Our results challenge the hypothesis that cerebral venous congestion plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of MS. Future studies should elucidate the difference between patients and healthy subjects in BVF regulation. No MS patient had >1 CCSVI criterion |
| Int Angiol. 2010 Apr;29(2):189-92. Chronic cerebro-spinal venous insufficiency: report of transcranial magnetic stimulation follow-up study in a patient with multiple sclerosis. | No | I patient | The demonstration of a modification of the cerebrovenous function with both clinical manifestation and via TMS suggests that the hampered cerebral venous return may contribute to the clinical course of MS. |
| Is chronic fatigue the symptom of venous insufficiency associated with multiple sclerosis? A longitudinal pilot study. Int Angiol. 2010 Apr;29(2):176-82. | No. | 31 fatigue testing 1, 6 and 12 mos post-procedure | The reestablishment of cerebral venous return dramatically reduced CF perception in a group of MS patients with associated CCSVI, suggesting that CF is likely the symptom of CCSVI. Note: Patients were identified as having CCSVI and Chronic Fatigue |
| Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis Omar Khan MD1,*, Massimo Filippi MD2, Mark S. Freedman MD3, et al ANN NEUROL 2010;67:286–290 | | | In this Point of View, we discuss the recent investigations that led to the description of CCSVI as well as the conceptual and technical shortcomings that challenge the potential relationship of this phenomenon to MS. The need for conducting carefully designed and rigorously controlled studies to investigate CCVSI has been recognized by the scientific bodies engaged in MS research. At present, invasive and potentially dangerous endovascular procedures as therapy for patients with MS should be discouraged until such studies have been completed, analyzed, and debated in the scientific arena. |
| Venous and cerebrospinal fluid flow in multiple sclerosis: A case-control study . Peter Sundström MD, PhD1,*, Anders Wåhlin MSc2, Khalid et al | No | 21 MS 20 control | We found no differences regarding internal jugular venous outflow, aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow, or the presence of internal jugular blood reflux. Three of 21 cases had internal jugular vein stenoses. In conclusion, we found no evidence confirming the suggested vascular multiple sclerosis hypothesis. ANN NEUROL 2010;68:255–259 |
| Endovascular treatment for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: is the procedure safe? T Ludyga *, M Kazibudzki *, M Simka * , M Hartel , M wierad *, J Piegza *, P Latacz *, L Sedlak * and M Tochowicz * | No | 564 procedures in 331 MS patients with CCSVI | The procedures appeared to be safe and well tolerated by the patients, regardless of the actual impact of the endovascular treatments for venous pathology on the clinical course of multiple sclerosis, which warrants long-term follow-up. |
| No association of abnormal cranial venous drainage with multiple sclerosis: a magnetic resonance venography and flow-quantification study | Yes | 20 MS, 20 control MRV studies (magnetic resonance venography) | A completely normal venous anatomy was observed in 10 MS patients and 12 controls. Anomalies of the venous system (venous stenosis/occlusions) were found in 10 MS patients and eight healthy controls. An anomalous venous system in combination with associated alternative venous drainage was observed in six MS patients and five healthy controls. Flow quantification showed no venous backflow in any MS patient or control. Conclusions Findings suggestive of anomalies of the cranial venous outflow anatomy were frequently observed in both MS patients and healthy controls. Given the normal intracranial venous flow quantification results, it is likely that these findings reflect anatomical variants of venous drainage rather than clinically relevant venous outflow obstructions. |
| Iron and Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis Michael Khalil,1, 2 Charlotte Teunissen,2 and Christian Langkammer1 Multiple Sclerosis International Volume 2011, Article ID 606807, | | | In summary, increased iron deposition has been consistently reported to occur in MS, but its role in pathogenetic processes of this disease has not yet been completely clarified. Quantitative MRI and histopathologic analyses of postmortem MS brains should complement these [9] studies. |
| | | | |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





